<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Second Reading of &#8220;Ways of Seeing&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kfitz.wordpress.com/2006/09/19/second-reading-of-ways-of-seeing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kfitz.wordpress.com/2006/09/19/second-reading-of-ways-of-seeing/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress.com weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 23:36:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Allison Crerie</title>
		<link>http://kfitz.wordpress.com/2006/09/19/second-reading-of-ways-of-seeing/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Allison Crerie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 22:10:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kfitz.wordpress.com/2006/09/19/second-reading-of-ways-of-seeing/#comment-12</guid>
		<description>I like how you touched on the &quot;experts&quot; and how they mystify art work, I mentioned the same thing as well.

&quot;This is not to say that there are certain levels of “knowing” and that once one level is surpassed perception is altered.&quot;

That&#039;s just straight up awesome. I totally agree that each person has their own specific &quot;perception&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like how you touched on the &#8220;experts&#8221; and how they mystify art work, I mentioned the same thing as well.</p>
<p>&#8220;This is not to say that there are certain levels of “knowing” and that once one level is surpassed perception is altered.&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s just straight up awesome. I totally agree that each person has their own specific &#8220;perception&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle Wadkins</title>
		<link>http://kfitz.wordpress.com/2006/09/19/second-reading-of-ways-of-seeing/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle Wadkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 22:06:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kfitz.wordpress.com/2006/09/19/second-reading-of-ways-of-seeing/#comment-11</guid>
		<description>Dear Kathy, 
I really liked your ideas about perception and seeing the object. Good job on the questions.
Love, Kyle</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Kathy,<br />
I really liked your ideas about perception and seeing the object. Good job on the questions.<br />
Love, Kyle</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kkellehe</title>
		<link>http://kfitz.wordpress.com/2006/09/19/second-reading-of-ways-of-seeing/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>kkellehe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 22:06:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kfitz.wordpress.com/2006/09/19/second-reading-of-ways-of-seeing/#comment-10</guid>
		<description>Good insights, I agree with your interpretations of the reading</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good insights, I agree with your interpretations of the reading</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
